A large dose of playa is good for you.
A large dose of playa is good for you.
Strange night-time blossoms.
The 23rd First Annual Ig Nobel Awards Ceremony was held September 12 at Harvard. The event is sponsored by Improbable Research (Link), an organization that looks at ridiculous research studies. (A quick read via an abbreviated version at www.io9.com is available here.) Some of the “winners” research is amazingly… stupid.
Awarded to: Bert Tolkamp and colleagues, for making two related discoveries: First, that the longer a cow has been lying down, the more likely that cow will soon stand up; and Second, that once a cow stands up, you cannot easily predict how soon that cow will lie down again.
Reference: “Are Cows More Likely to Lie Down the Longer They Stand?” Bert J. Tolkamp, Marie J. Haskell, Fritha M. Langford, David J. Roberts, Colin A. Morgan, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 124, nos. 1-2, 2010, pp. 1–10.
(sigh)
Seriously, you can’t make this up. I’m sure much of the “research” is paid for with tax dollars as well.
But on a positive note, the way they keep the acceptance speeches short is nothing but brilliant.
The organizers of the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony solved an ancient problem: How to keep speeches from droning on and on… The solution, called “Miss Sweetie Poo”, is an 8-year-old girl who tells long-winded speakers to “Please stop. I’m bored. Please stop. I’m bored…”
This got me to thinking… How could we incorporate a cute, little 8-year old girl into a design presentation?
Bandanna trade currency.
In Seattle, they take pizza seriously.
Unless you’re an economist, you’ve probably never heard this word. (I’m not even sure how to pronounce it.) But holy crap, it’s real. Defined as creative economic destruction, it often results in disruption. (Recognized elsewhere in this blog.)
It’s number 5, from “The Cognitive Distortions of People Who Get Stuff Done” Link, which made me think immediately of Steve Jobs, the quintessential disruptor. The official “eduspeak” terminology is in the PDF, but I prefer the prevalent thought processes expressed in common lingo:
So, if you are a “creative destruction machine,” you are a schumpeterer. Or… a schumpeterier? (lol)
I find this interesting because earlier this week I met with a friend who works as a designer for the state – and hates it. OMG, does he hate it! He doesn’t actually hate the work – he hates the bullshit he has to deal with – to do the work. And based on what he told me, it is insane.
They don’t keep time sheets. They can’t be fired. They have ridiculous turnarounds on projects. (Not short, but long.) They have meetings to discuss meetings about meetings. Everything is a committee decision. They can spend months (and money) on a project, only to see it suddenly and quietly disappear. They can have multiple and often conflicting bosses. They have to endure relentless politics and position-jockeying along with considerable back stabbing and bush whacking by peers.
Yeah, sure sounds like a fun place. (sarcasm)
In fact, it’s the polar opposite of the Cognitive Distortions’ list above. So I took a stab at a new list, called:
Now we know why everything takes forever. Or never gets done. Or is way over budget.
By Milton Glaser (Link)
My favorite is #3, Some People are Toxic, Avoid Them
Here is the test: You have spent some time with this person, either you have a drink or go for dinner or you go to a ball game. It doesn’t matter very much but at the end of that time you observe whether you are more energized or less energized. Whether you are tired or whether you are exhilarated. If you are more tired then you have been poisoned. If you have more energy you have been nourished. The test is almost infallible and I suggest that you use it for the rest of your life.
So true. Also #7, #8 and #10.
…there are two types of people in this world: There are the type of people who are going to live up to what they said they were going to do yesterday, and then there are people who are full of shit. And that’s all you really need to know.
— Anthony Bourdain